{"id":8539,"date":"2023-12-20T17:32:58","date_gmt":"2023-12-20T17:32:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/?p=8539"},"modified":"2023-12-20T20:40:21","modified_gmt":"2023-12-20T20:40:21","slug":"ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/2023\/12\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\/","title":{"rendered":"AI kan inte anges som uppfinnare f\u00f6r patent, beslutar brittisk domstol"},"content":{"rendered":"

I ett viktigt beslut av Storbritanniens h\u00f6gsta domstol kan AI inte anges som uppfinnare i en patentans\u00f6kan.\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n

Det h\u00e4r fallet h\u00e4rr\u00f6r fr\u00e5n en datavetare, Dr. Stephen Thaler, som ville tillskriva patent f\u00f6r en matbeh\u00e5llare och en blinkande ljussignal till sin AI-chattbot, Dabus. Han ans\u00f6kte om patent hos totalt 18 patentverk runt om i v\u00e4rlden.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Hans ans\u00f6kan avslogs f\u00f6rst av den brittiska patentmyndigheten IPO (Intellectual Property Office) 2019 med motiveringen att \"endast en person kan anges som uppfinnare\". Thaler tog sedan sitt \u00e4rende vidare till H\u00f6gsta domstolen.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

H\u00f6gsta domstolens senaste beslut \u00e4r ett eko av denna h\u00e5llning. \u00c4ven om den inte g\u00e5r in p\u00e5 AI:ns uppfinningsrikedom, sl\u00e5r den fast att \"en uppfinnare m\u00e5ste vara en person\". Detta avg\u00f6rande ligger i linje med tidigare domar fr\u00e5n High Court och Court of Appeal.<\/span><\/p>\n

Att ta itu med konsekvenserna av detta beslut, Dr Thaler uttryckte oro till BBC<\/a> om framtiden f\u00f6r AI-innovationer: \"Om AI-uppfinningar inte kan skyddas kommer m\u00e5nga v\u00e4rdefulla innovationer som gynnar m\u00e4nskligheten att bli f\u00f6r\u00e4ldral\u00f6sa.\"\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Han varnade f\u00f6r att detta skulle kunna uppmuntra \"o\u00e4rliga handlingar, kanske till och med brottslighet\" och tillade: \"Jag tror inte att samh\u00e4llet i stort vill att s\u00e5dana saker ska h\u00e4nda.\"<\/span><\/p>\n

IPO v\u00e4lkomnade domen f\u00f6r dess tydlighet, men noterade samtidigt att \"regeringen kommer \u00e4nd\u00e5 att se \u00f6ver detta r\u00e4ttsomr\u00e5de f\u00f6r att s\u00e4kerst\u00e4lla att det brittiska patentsystemet st\u00f6der AI-innovation och anv\u00e4ndningen av AI i Storbritannien\".<\/span><\/p>\n

Domstolar \u00f6ver hela v\u00e4rlden b\u00f6rjar reagera p\u00e5 AI-relaterade fall, bland annat en domstol i Peking som <\/span>nyligen beslutat att AI-genererade<\/span><\/a> konstverk inte kunde vara upphovsr\u00e4ttsskyddade. St\u00e4mningsans\u00f6kningar mot AI-utvecklare \u00e4r fortfarande p\u00e5 g\u00e5ng, \u00e4ven om en nyligen fick l\u00e4mnas in p\u00e5 nytt efter en <\/span>domstolen avvisade den<\/span><\/a>.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Flera perspektiv<\/span><\/h2>\n

Juridisk expert Rajvinder Jagdev fr\u00e5n Powell Gilbert<\/a> f\u00f6rtydligade domen och sade: \"Domen utesluter inte att en person anv\u00e4nder en AI f\u00f6r att komma p\u00e5 en uppfinning - i ett s\u00e5dant scenario skulle det vara m\u00f6jligt att ans\u00f6ka om patent, f\u00f6rutsatt att personen identifieras som uppfinnare.\"<\/span><\/p>\n

Detta inneb\u00e4r i princip att domen inte helt utesluter AI:s medverkan i uppfinningsprocessen.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00c4ven om AI inte kan krediteras som uppfinnare kan det hj\u00e4lpa till att skapa en uppfinning. I s\u00e5dana fall kan den m\u00e4nniska som anv\u00e4nder AI:n identifieras som uppfinnare och ans\u00f6ka om patent. Detta \u00e5terspeglar en m\u00e4nniskocentrerad syn p\u00e5 uppfinnarskapet, d\u00e4r AI erk\u00e4nns som ett verktyg snarare \u00e4n en oberoende skapare.<\/span><\/p>\n

Andra perspektiv v\u00e4cker fr\u00e5gan om huruvida programmeraren av AI:n eller anv\u00e4ndaren som uppmanar maskinen ska betraktas som skaparen.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Och t\u00e4nk om en AI, som Dabus, skulle kunna fungera autonomt i en s\u00e5dan utstr\u00e4ckning att den skulle kunna ses som sj\u00e4lva \"skaparen\"?<\/span><\/p>\n

N\u00e4r AI-modeller blir kapabla till autonom kreativitet, \u00e4ven om det kommer att bli sv\u00e5rt att definiera detta, kommer immaterialr\u00e4tten sannolikt att utmanas p\u00e5 nytt.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Simon Barker, partner inom immaterialr\u00e4tt p\u00e5 advokatbyr\u00e5n Freeths<\/span><\/a>I en kommentar till detta perspektiv sa Dr Thaler: \"\u00c4r det AI:ns programmerare som \u00e4r skaparen, eller \u00e4r det anv\u00e4ndaren som \u00e4r ansvarig f\u00f6r att uppmana maskinen? Och vad h\u00e4nder om det verkligen bara \u00e4r maskinen sj\u00e4lv, som Dr Thaler h\u00e4vdade om Dabus?\"<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00c4ven om detta beslut kanske passar nuvarande generationer av AI, kommer det utan tvekan att \u00e4ndras i takt med att tekniken blir mer autonom.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I ett banbrytande beslut av Storbritanniens h\u00f6gsta domstol kan AI inte anges som uppfinnare i en patentans\u00f6kan. Fallet h\u00e4rr\u00f6r fr\u00e5n en datavetare, Dr. Stephen Thaler, som ville tillskriva patent f\u00f6r en matbeh\u00e5llare och en blinkande ljusfyr till sin AI-chatbot, Dabus. Han ans\u00f6kte om patent hos totalt 18 patentverk runt om i v\u00e4rlden. Hans ans\u00f6kan avslogs f\u00f6rst av UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO) 2019, med motiveringen att \"endast en person kan anges som uppfinnare\". Thaler tog sedan sitt fall vidare till H\u00f6gsta domstolen.\u00a0<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":5987,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[88],"tags":[197],"class_list":["post-8539","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ethics","tag-copyright"],"yoast_head":"\nAI can't be named as an an inventor for patents, UK court decides | DailyAI<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a milestone decision by the UK Supreme Court, AI cannot be named as an inventor in a patent application.\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/2023\/12\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"sv_SE\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"AI can't be named as an an inventor for patents, UK court decides | DailyAI\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a milestone decision by the UK Supreme Court, AI cannot be named as an inventor in a patent application.\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/2023\/12\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"DailyAI\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-12-20T17:32:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-12-20T20:40:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/shutterstock_305195807.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"669\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sam Jeans\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@DailyAIOfficial\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@DailyAIOfficial\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Skriven av\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sam Jeans\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Ber\u00e4knad l\u00e4stid\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minuter\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sam Jeans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/711e81f945549438e8bbc579efdeb3c9\"},\"headline\":\"AI can’t be named as an an inventor for patents, UK court decides\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-12-20T17:32:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-12-20T20:40:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":548,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/09\\\/shutterstock_305195807.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Copyright\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Ethics & Society\"],\"inLanguage\":\"sv-SE\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\\\/\",\"name\":\"AI can't be named as an an inventor for patents, UK court decides | DailyAI\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/09\\\/shutterstock_305195807.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-12-20T17:32:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-12-20T20:40:21+00:00\",\"description\":\"In a milestone decision by the UK Supreme Court, AI cannot be named as an inventor in a patent application.\u00a0\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"sv-SE\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sv-SE\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/09\\\/shutterstock_305195807.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/09\\\/shutterstock_305195807.jpg\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":669,\"caption\":\"AI Safety Summit\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"AI can’t be named as an an inventor for patents, UK court decides\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"DailyAI\",\"description\":\"Your Daily Dose of AI News\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"sv-SE\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"DailyAI\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sv-SE\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Daily-Ai_TL_colour.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Daily-Ai_TL_colour.png\",\"width\":4501,\"height\":934,\"caption\":\"DailyAI\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/DailyAIOfficial\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/dailyaiofficial\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@DailyAIOfficial\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/711e81f945549438e8bbc579efdeb3c9\",\"name\":\"Sam Jeans\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sv-SE\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a24a4a8f8e2a1a275b7491dc9c9f032c401eabf23c3206da4628dc84b6dac5c8?s=96&d=robohash&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a24a4a8f8e2a1a275b7491dc9c9f032c401eabf23c3206da4628dc84b6dac5c8?s=96&d=robohash&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a24a4a8f8e2a1a275b7491dc9c9f032c401eabf23c3206da4628dc84b6dac5c8?s=96&d=robohash&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sam Jeans\"},\"description\":\"Sam is a science and technology writer who has worked in various AI startups. When he\u2019s not writing, he can be found reading medical journals or digging through boxes of vinyl records.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/sam-jeans-6746b9142\\\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/sv\\\/author\\\/samjeans\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"AI kan inte anges som uppfinnare f\u00f6r patent, beslutar brittisk domstol | DailyAI","description":"I ett viktigt beslut fr\u00e5n H\u00f6gsta domstolen i Storbritannien kan AI inte anges som uppfinnare i en patentans\u00f6kan.\u00a0","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/2023\/12\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\/","og_locale":"sv_SE","og_type":"article","og_title":"AI can't be named as an an inventor for patents, UK court decides | DailyAI","og_description":"In a milestone decision by the UK Supreme Court, AI cannot be named as an inventor in a patent application.\u00a0","og_url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/2023\/12\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\/","og_site_name":"DailyAI","article_published_time":"2023-12-20T17:32:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-12-20T20:40:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1000,"height":669,"url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/shutterstock_305195807.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sam Jeans","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@DailyAIOfficial","twitter_site":"@DailyAIOfficial","twitter_misc":{"Skriven av":"Sam Jeans","Ber\u00e4knad l\u00e4stid":"3 minuter"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/12\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/12\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\/"},"author":{"name":"Sam Jeans","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#\/schema\/person\/711e81f945549438e8bbc579efdeb3c9"},"headline":"AI can’t be named as an an inventor for patents, UK court decides","datePublished":"2023-12-20T17:32:58+00:00","dateModified":"2023-12-20T20:40:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/12\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\/"},"wordCount":548,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/12\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/shutterstock_305195807.jpg","keywords":["Copyright"],"articleSection":["Ethics & Society"],"inLanguage":"sv-SE"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/12\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\/","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/12\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\/","name":"AI kan inte anges som uppfinnare f\u00f6r patent, beslutar brittisk domstol | DailyAI","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/12\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/12\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/shutterstock_305195807.jpg","datePublished":"2023-12-20T17:32:58+00:00","dateModified":"2023-12-20T20:40:21+00:00","description":"I ett viktigt beslut fr\u00e5n H\u00f6gsta domstolen i Storbritannien kan AI inte anges som uppfinnare i en patentans\u00f6kan.\u00a0","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/12\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"sv-SE","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/12\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sv-SE","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/12\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/shutterstock_305195807.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/shutterstock_305195807.jpg","width":1000,"height":669,"caption":"AI Safety Summit"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/12\/ai-cant-be-named-as-an-an-inventor-for-patents-uk-court-decides\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"AI can’t be named as an an inventor for patents, UK court decides"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/","name":"DagligaAI","description":"Din dagliga dos av AI-nyheter","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"sv-SE"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#organization","name":"DagligaAI","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sv-SE","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/Daily-Ai_TL_colour.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/Daily-Ai_TL_colour.png","width":4501,"height":934,"caption":"DailyAI"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/DailyAIOfficial","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/dailyaiofficial\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@DailyAIOfficial"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#\/schema\/person\/711e81f945549438e8bbc579efdeb3c9","name":"Sam Jeans","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sv-SE","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a24a4a8f8e2a1a275b7491dc9c9f032c401eabf23c3206da4628dc84b6dac5c8?s=96&d=robohash&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a24a4a8f8e2a1a275b7491dc9c9f032c401eabf23c3206da4628dc84b6dac5c8?s=96&d=robohash&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a24a4a8f8e2a1a275b7491dc9c9f032c401eabf23c3206da4628dc84b6dac5c8?s=96&d=robohash&r=g","caption":"Sam Jeans"},"description":"Sam \u00e4r en vetenskaps- och teknikskribent som har arbetat i olika AI-startups. N\u00e4r han inte skriver l\u00e4ser han medicinska tidskrifter eller gr\u00e4ver igenom l\u00e5dor med vinylskivor.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/sam-jeans-6746b9142\/"],"url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/author\/samjeans\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8539","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8539"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8539\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8558,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8539\/revisions\/8558"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5987"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8539"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8539"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8539"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}