{"id":14612,"date":"2025-03-26T21:31:31","date_gmt":"2025-03-26T21:31:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/?p=14612"},"modified":"2025-03-26T21:34:19","modified_gmt":"2025-03-26T21:34:19","slug":"ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/","title":{"rendered":"AI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Scientific publishing in confronting an increasingly provocative issue: what do you do about AI in peer review?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ecologist Timoth\u00e9e Poisot recently received a review that was clearly generated by ChatGPT. The document had the following telltale string of words attached: \u201cHere is a revised version of your review with improved clarity and structure.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Poisot was incensed. &#8220;I submit a manuscript for review in the hope of getting comments from my peers,&#8221; he fumed in a blog post. &#8220;If this assumption is not met, the entire social contract of peer review is gone.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Poisot&#8217;s experience is not an isolated incident. A <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/d41586-024-01051-2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">nyligen genomf\u00f6rd studie<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> published in Nature found that up to 17% of reviews for AI conference papers in 2023-24 showed signs of substantial modification by language models. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">And in a separate <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/d41586-025-00343-5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Nature survey<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, nearly one in five researchers admitted to using AI to speed up and ease the peer review process.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">We\u2019ve also seen a few absurd cases of what happens when AI-generated content slips through the peer review process, which is designed to uphold the quality of research.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In 2024, a <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/2024\/02\/peer-reviewed-paper-published-in-frontiers-with-nonsense-ai-images\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">paper published in the Frontiers<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> journal, which explored some highly complex cell signaling pathways, was found to contain bizarre, nonsensical diagrams generated by the AI art tool Midjourney.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One image depicted a deformed rat, while others were just random swirls and squiggles, filled with gibberish text.<\/span><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_14613\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-14613\" style=\"width: 707px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-14613\" src=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/GGYf9oxWYAAt5Z--1024x833.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"707\" height=\"575\" srcset=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/GGYf9oxWYAAt5Z--1024x833.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/GGYf9oxWYAAt5Z--300x244.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/GGYf9oxWYAAt5Z--768x625.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/GGYf9oxWYAAt5Z--15x12.jpeg 15w, https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/GGYf9oxWYAAt5Z--1079x878.jpeg 1079w, https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/GGYf9oxWYAAt5Z--60x49.jpeg 60w, https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/GGYf9oxWYAAt5Z-.jpeg 1374w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 707px) 100vw, 707px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-14613\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">This nonsense AI-generated diagram appeared in the peer-reviewed paper Frontiers in 2024. Source: Frontiers.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Commenters on Twitter were aghast that such obviously flawed figures made it through peer review. &#8220;Erm, how did Figure 1 get past a peer reviewer?!&#8221; one asked.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In essence, there are two risks: a) peer reviewers using AI to review content, and b) AI-generated content slipping through the entire peer review process.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Publishers are responding to the issues. Elsevier has banned generative AI in peer review outright. Wiley and Springer Nature allow &#8220;limited use&#8221; with disclosure. A few, like the American Institute of Physics, are gingerly piloting AI tools to supplement \u2013 but not supplant \u2013 human feedback.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, gen AI\u2019s allure is strong, and some see the benefits if applied judiciously. A Stanford study found 40% of scientists felt ChatGPT reviews of their work could be as helpful as human ones, and 20% more helpful.<\/span><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_14614\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-14614\" style=\"width: 732px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-14614\" src=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Screenshot-2025-03-26-211442-1024x560.png\" alt=\"peer review\" width=\"732\" height=\"400\" srcset=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Screenshot-2025-03-26-211442-1024x560.png 1024w, https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Screenshot-2025-03-26-211442-300x164.png 300w, https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Screenshot-2025-03-26-211442-768x420.png 768w, https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Screenshot-2025-03-26-211442-18x10.png 18w, https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Screenshot-2025-03-26-211442-60x33.png 60w, https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Screenshot-2025-03-26-211442.png 1493w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 732px) 100vw, 732px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-14614\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Researchers often have positive reactions to AI-generated peer reviews. Source: Nature<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Academia has revolved around human input for a millenia, though, so the resistance is strong.\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&#8220;Not combating automated reviews means we have given up,&#8221; Poisot wrote. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The whole point of peer review, many argue, is considered feedback from fellow experts \u2013 not an algorithmic rubber stamp.<\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Scientific publishing in confronting an increasingly provocative issue: what do you do about AI in peer review?\u00a0 Ecologist Timoth\u00e9e Poisot recently received a review that was clearly generated by ChatGPT. The document had the following telltale string of words attached: \u201cHere is a revised version of your review with improved clarity and structure.\u201d\u00a0 Poisot was incensed. &#8220;I submit a manuscript for review in the hope of getting comments from my peers,&#8221; he fumed in a blog post. &#8220;If this assumption is not met, the entire social contract of peer review is gone.&#8221; Poisot&#8217;s experience is not an isolated incident. A<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":14615,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[84],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14612","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-industry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>AI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process | DailyAI<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"sv_SE\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"AI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process | DailyAI\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Scientific publishing in confronting an increasingly provocative issue: what do you do about AI in peer review?\u00a0 Ecologist Timoth\u00e9e Poisot recently received a review that was clearly generated by ChatGPT. The document had the following telltale string of words attached: \u201cHere is a revised version of your review with improved clarity and structure.\u201d\u00a0 Poisot was incensed. &#8220;I submit a manuscript for review in the hope of getting comments from my peers,&#8221; he fumed in a blog post. &#8220;If this assumption is not met, the entire social contract of peer review is gone.&#8221; Poisot&#8217;s experience is not an isolated incident. A\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"DailyAI\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-26T21:31:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-26T21:34:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/6cfd0394-704d-4aae-8681-5f426c7c6a94-1024x683.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"683\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sam Jeans\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@DailyAIOfficial\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@DailyAIOfficial\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Skriven av\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sam Jeans\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Ber\u00e4knad l\u00e4stid\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minuter\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sam Jeans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/711e81f945549438e8bbc579efdeb3c9\"},\"headline\":\"AI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-26T21:31:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-26T21:34:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":453,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/6cfd0394-704d-4aae-8681-5f426c7c6a94.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Industry\"],\"inLanguage\":\"sv-SE\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/\",\"name\":\"AI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process | DailyAI\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/6cfd0394-704d-4aae-8681-5f426c7c6a94.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-26T21:31:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-26T21:34:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"sv-SE\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sv-SE\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/6cfd0394-704d-4aae-8681-5f426c7c6a94.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/6cfd0394-704d-4aae-8681-5f426c7c6a94.png\",\"width\":1536,\"height\":1024},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"AI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"DailyAI\",\"description\":\"Your Daily Dose of AI News\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"sv-SE\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"DailyAI\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sv-SE\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Daily-Ai_TL_colour.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Daily-Ai_TL_colour.png\",\"width\":4501,\"height\":934,\"caption\":\"DailyAI\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/DailyAIOfficial\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/dailyaiofficial\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@DailyAIOfficial\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/711e81f945549438e8bbc579efdeb3c9\",\"name\":\"Sam Jeans\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sv-SE\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a24a4a8f8e2a1a275b7491dc9c9f032c401eabf23c3206da4628dc84b6dac5c8?s=96&d=robohash&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a24a4a8f8e2a1a275b7491dc9c9f032c401eabf23c3206da4628dc84b6dac5c8?s=96&d=robohash&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a24a4a8f8e2a1a275b7491dc9c9f032c401eabf23c3206da4628dc84b6dac5c8?s=96&d=robohash&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sam Jeans\"},\"description\":\"Sam is a science and technology writer who has worked in various AI startups. When he\u2019s not writing, he can be found reading medical journals or digging through boxes of vinyl records.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/sam-jeans-6746b9142\\\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/sv\\\/author\\\/samjeans\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"AI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process | DailyAI","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/","og_locale":"sv_SE","og_type":"article","og_title":"AI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process | DailyAI","og_description":"Scientific publishing in confronting an increasingly provocative issue: what do you do about AI in peer review?\u00a0 Ecologist Timoth\u00e9e Poisot recently received a review that was clearly generated by ChatGPT. The document had the following telltale string of words attached: \u201cHere is a revised version of your review with improved clarity and structure.\u201d\u00a0 Poisot was incensed. &#8220;I submit a manuscript for review in the hope of getting comments from my peers,&#8221; he fumed in a blog post. &#8220;If this assumption is not met, the entire social contract of peer review is gone.&#8221; Poisot&#8217;s experience is not an isolated incident. A","og_url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/","og_site_name":"DailyAI","article_published_time":"2025-03-26T21:31:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-26T21:34:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":683,"url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/6cfd0394-704d-4aae-8681-5f426c7c6a94-1024x683.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Sam Jeans","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@DailyAIOfficial","twitter_site":"@DailyAIOfficial","twitter_misc":{"Skriven av":"Sam Jeans","Ber\u00e4knad l\u00e4stid":"3 minuter"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/"},"author":{"name":"Sam Jeans","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#\/schema\/person\/711e81f945549438e8bbc579efdeb3c9"},"headline":"AI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process","datePublished":"2025-03-26T21:31:31+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-26T21:34:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/"},"wordCount":453,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/6cfd0394-704d-4aae-8681-5f426c7c6a94.png","articleSection":["Industry"],"inLanguage":"sv-SE"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/","name":"AI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process | DailyAI","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/6cfd0394-704d-4aae-8681-5f426c7c6a94.png","datePublished":"2025-03-26T21:31:31+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-26T21:34:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"sv-SE","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sv-SE","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/6cfd0394-704d-4aae-8681-5f426c7c6a94.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/6cfd0394-704d-4aae-8681-5f426c7c6a94.png","width":1536,"height":1024},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"AI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/","name":"DagligaAI","description":"Din dagliga dos av AI-nyheter","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"sv-SE"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#organization","name":"DagligaAI","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sv-SE","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/Daily-Ai_TL_colour.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/Daily-Ai_TL_colour.png","width":4501,"height":934,"caption":"DailyAI"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/DailyAIOfficial","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/dailyaiofficial\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@DailyAIOfficial"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#\/schema\/person\/711e81f945549438e8bbc579efdeb3c9","name":"Sam Jeans","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sv-SE","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a24a4a8f8e2a1a275b7491dc9c9f032c401eabf23c3206da4628dc84b6dac5c8?s=96&d=robohash&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a24a4a8f8e2a1a275b7491dc9c9f032c401eabf23c3206da4628dc84b6dac5c8?s=96&d=robohash&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a24a4a8f8e2a1a275b7491dc9c9f032c401eabf23c3206da4628dc84b6dac5c8?s=96&d=robohash&r=g","caption":"Sam Jeans"},"description":"Sam \u00e4r en vetenskaps- och teknikskribent som har arbetat i olika AI-startups. N\u00e4r han inte skriver l\u00e4ser han medicinska tidskrifter eller gr\u00e4ver igenom l\u00e5dor med vinylskivor.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/sam-jeans-6746b9142\/"],"url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/author\/samjeans\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14612","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14612"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14612\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14618,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14612\/revisions\/14618"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14615"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14612"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14612"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14612"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}