{"id":7910,"date":"2023-12-03T06:56:31","date_gmt":"2023-12-03T06:56:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/?p=7910"},"modified":"2023-12-04T03:37:10","modified_gmt":"2023-12-04T03:37:10","slug":"artists-added-to-resubmitted-stability-ai-midjourney-lawsuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/nl\/2023\/12\/artists-added-to-resubmitted-stability-ai-midjourney-lawsuit\/","title":{"rendered":"Artiesten toegevoegd aan opnieuw ingediende Stability AI, rechtszaak Midjourney"},"content":{"rendered":"

A dismissed lawsuit brought by a group of artists against Stability AI and others has been resubmitted with seven additional plaintiffs added.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The original lawsuit<\/a> had its claims of copyright infringement dismissed in October by Judge William Orrick who disagreed that generating similar images was the same as copyright infringement.<\/p>\n

While dismissing this aspect of the claim, Orrick said the plaintiffs could resubmit an amended suit in which they\u2019d need to be more convincing in their allegations against Stability AI, Midjourney, DeviantArt, and Runway.<\/p>\n

The original plaintiffs were artists Sarah Anderson, Kelly McKernan, and Karla Ortiz. They are now joined by H. Southworth, Grzegorz Rutkowski, Gregory Manchess, Gerald Brom, Jingna Zhang, Julia Kaye, and Adam Ellis.<\/p>\n

The resubmitted suit contains some interesting arguments that, if accepted by the court, will have significant ramifications for all generative AI models trained using copyrighted data.<\/p>\n

CEO of Stability AI Emad Mostaque is known for speaking off the cuff and often making bold or sensationalist claims. Many of his words are quoted as evidence against his company in the filing.<\/p>\n

You can read the amended lawsuit filings here<\/a>, but here are some notable highlights.<\/p>\n

Can it really make a copy of the original?<\/h2>\n

The previous copyright claims were dismissed partly because the judge ruled that generating a similar image was not the same as producing a copy of an image.<\/p>\n

The new submission says these models can duplicate their training data and quotes Mostaque saying, \u201cWe took 100,000 gigabytes of images and compressed it to a two-gigabyte file that can recreate any of those [images] and iterations of those.\u201d<\/p>\n

It further quotes Mostaque saying, \u201cIronically [the] main funding of stability except me is \u2026 artists\u2026LOL\u201d<\/p>\n

The new filing asserts that \u201cCopyright law protects artists\u2019 works from infringement by creating exclusive rights of artists to make copies of their works, to make derivative works of their copyrighted works.\u201d<\/p>\n

The word \u201cderivative\u201d is key here. If you ask Midjourney to generate an image in the style of Kelly McKernan have you and Midjourney violated McKernan’s copyright? You’ve got to feel for the artist when this happens:<\/p>\n

\n

The first image showing up under my name is AI. Screaming, crying, throwing up in my heart. pic.twitter.com\/GgsoEVLj3o<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Kelly McKernan (@Kelly_McKernan) November 29, 2023<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n