{"id":14612,"date":"2025-03-26T21:31:31","date_gmt":"2025-03-26T21:31:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/?p=14612"},"modified":"2026-10-25T14:51:00","modified_gmt":"2026-10-25T14:51:00","slug":"ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/nl\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/","title":{"rendered":"AI zorgt voor opschudding in het wetenschappelijke peerreviewproces."},"content":{"rendered":"

Wetenschappelijk publiceren wordt geconfronteerd met een steeds prikkelender vraagstuk: hoe ga je om met AI in peer review?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ecologist Timoth\u00e9e Poisot ontving onlangs een beoordeling die duidelijk door ChatGPT was gegenereerd. Het document bevatte de volgende veelzeggende tekst: "Hier is een herziene versie van uw beoordeling met verbeterde duidelijkheid en structuur."\u201c\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Poisot was woedend. "Ik dien een manuscript ter beoordeling in in de hoop commentaar van mijn collega's te krijgen," brieste hij in een blogpost. "Als aan deze verwachting niet wordt voldaan, is het hele sociale contract van collegiale beoordeling verdwenen."\u201c<\/span><\/p>\n

De ervaring van Poisot is geen op zichzelf staand incident. <\/span>recente studie<\/span><\/a> Uit een in Nature gepubliceerd onderzoek bleek dat tot wel 171.600 biljoen beoordelingen van AI-conferentiepapers in 2023-2024 tekenen vertoonden van aanzienlijke aanpassingen door taalmodellen. <\/span><\/p>\n

En in een aparte <\/span>Natuuronderzoek<\/span><\/a>, Bijna een op de vijf onderzoekers gaf toe AI te gebruiken om het peerreviewproces te versnellen en te vereenvoudigen.<\/span><\/p>\n

We hebben ook een paar absurde voorbeelden gezien van wat er gebeurt wanneer door AI gegenereerde content door het peerreviewproces glipt, een proces dat juist bedoeld is om de kwaliteit van onderzoek te waarborgen.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

In 2024, een <\/span>artikel gepubliceerd in Frontiers<\/span><\/a> In een tijdschrift dat enkele zeer complexe signaaloverdrachtsroutes in cellen onderzocht, werden bizarre, onzinnige diagrammen aangetroffen die waren gegenereerd door de AI-kunsttool Midjourney.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Op een van de afbeeldingen was een misvormde rat te zien, terwijl andere slechts willekeurige wervelingen en kronkels waren, gevuld met onzinnige tekst.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"
Dit onzinnige, door AI gegenereerde diagram verscheen in 2024 in het wetenschappelijke tijdschrift Frontiers. Bron: Frontiers.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Op Twitter reageerden mensen verbijsterd dat zulke overduidelijk gebrekkige figuren de peerreview hadden doorstaan. "Ehm, hoe heeft figuur 1 de peerreview kunnen passeren?!" vroeg iemand.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

In essentie zijn er twee risico's: a) peer reviewers die AI gebruiken om content te beoordelen, en b) AI-gegenereerde content die door het hele peer review-proces glipt.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Uitgevers reageren op de problemen. Elsevier heeft generatieve AI in peerreview volledig verboden. Wiley en Springer Nature staan "beperkt gebruik" toe, mits dit openbaar wordt gemaakt. Een paar, zoals het American Institute of Physics, experimenteren voorzichtig met AI-tools om menselijke feedback aan te vullen \u2013 maar niet te vervangen.<\/span><\/p>\n

De aantrekkingskracht van AI is echter groot, en sommigen zien de voordelen ervan als het oordeelkundig wordt toegepast. Een onderzoek van Stanford wees uit dat 401.600 wetenschappers vonden dat ChatGPT-reviews van hun werk net zo nuttig konden zijn als reviews door mensen, en 201.600 zelfs nuttiger.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"collegiale
Onderzoekers reageren vaak positief op door AI gegenereerde collegiale beoordelingen. Bron: Nature<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

De academische wereld draait al duizenden jaren om menselijke inbreng, dus de weerstand is groot.\u00a0<\/span>\u201c"Door geautomatiseerde beoordelingen niet te bestrijden, hebben we de strijd opgegeven," schreef Poisot. <\/span><\/p>\n

Het hele doel van collegiale toetsing, zo stellen velen, is feedback van collega-deskundigen \u2013 en niet een algoritmische goedkeuring.<\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Scientific publishing in confronting an increasingly provocative issue: what do you do about AI in peer review?\u00a0 Ecologist Timoth\u00e9e Poisot recently received a review that was clearly generated by ChatGPT. The document had the following telltale string of words attached: \u201cHere is a revised version of your review with improved clarity and structure.\u201d\u00a0 Poisot was incensed. “I submit a manuscript for review in the hope of getting comments from my peers,” he fumed in a blog post. “If this assumption is not met, the entire social contract of peer review is gone.” Poisot’s experience is not an isolated incident. A<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":15538,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[84],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14612","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-industry"],"yoast_head":"\nAI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process | DailyAI<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/nl\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"nl_NL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"AI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process | DailyAI\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Scientific publishing in confronting an increasingly provocative issue: what do you do about AI in peer review?\u00a0 Ecologist Timoth\u00e9e Poisot recently received a review that was clearly generated by ChatGPT. The document had the following telltale string of words attached: \u201cHere is a revised version of your review with improved clarity and structure.\u201d\u00a0 Poisot was incensed. “I submit a manuscript for review in the hope of getting comments from my peers,” he fumed in a blog post. “If this assumption is not met, the entire social contract of peer review is gone.” Poisot’s experience is not an isolated incident. A\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/nl\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"DailyAI\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-26T21:31:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-10-25T14:51:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/6cfd0394-704d-4aae-8681-5f426c7c6a94-1024x683.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"683\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sam Jeans\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@DailyAIOfficial\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@DailyAIOfficial\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Geschreven door\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sam Jeans\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Geschatte leestijd\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minuten\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sam Jeans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/711e81f945549438e8bbc579efdeb3c9\"},\"headline\":\"AI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-26T21:31:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-25T14:51:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":453,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/dai-house-14612.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Industry\"],\"inLanguage\":\"nl-NL\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/\",\"name\":\"AI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process | DailyAI\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/dai-house-14612.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-26T21:31:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-25T14:51:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"nl-NL\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"nl-NL\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/dai-house-14612.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/dai-house-14612.jpg\",\"width\":1472,\"height\":832,\"caption\":\"Flat navy and red illustration on a cream background for the story: AI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"AI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"DailyAI\",\"description\":\"The AI economy, measured.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"nl-NL\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"DailyAI\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"nl-NL\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Daily-Ai_TL_colour.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Daily-Ai_TL_colour.png\",\"width\":4501,\"height\":934,\"caption\":\"DailyAI\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/DailyAIOfficial\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/dailyaiofficial\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@DailyAIOfficial\"],\"legalName\":\"Zero Hour Investments FZCO\",\"foundingDate\":\"2023\",\"slogan\":\"The AI economy, measured.\",\"description\":\"DailyAI tracks the AI economy in numbers: data trackers, research and plain-English news on jobs, spending, pricing and funding.\",\"address\":{\"@type\":\"PostalAddress\",\"addressCountry\":\"AE\"},\"contactPoint\":{\"@type\":\"ContactPoint\",\"contactType\":\"customer support\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/contact\\\/\"},\"founder\":{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"name\":\"David Merry\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/author\\\/davidmerry\\\/\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/davidmerry\\\/\"]}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/711e81f945549438e8bbc579efdeb3c9\",\"name\":\"Sam Jeans\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"nl-NL\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/sam-jeans-dailyai.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/sam-jeans-dailyai.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/sam-jeans-dailyai.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Sam Jeans\"},\"description\":\"Sam is a science and technology writer who has worked in various AI startups. Outside writing, he can be found reading medical journals or digging through boxes of vinyl records.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/sam-jeans-6746b9142\\\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/nl\\\/author\\\/samjeans\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"AI zorgt voor opschudding in het wetenschappelijke peerreviewproces | DailyAI","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/nl\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/","og_locale":"nl_NL","og_type":"article","og_title":"AI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process | DailyAI","og_description":"Scientific publishing in confronting an increasingly provocative issue: what do you do about AI in peer review?\u00a0 Ecologist Timoth\u00e9e Poisot recently received a review that was clearly generated by ChatGPT. The document had the following telltale string of words attached: \u201cHere is a revised version of your review with improved clarity and structure.\u201d\u00a0 Poisot was incensed. “I submit a manuscript for review in the hope of getting comments from my peers,” he fumed in a blog post. “If this assumption is not met, the entire social contract of peer review is gone.” Poisot’s experience is not an isolated incident. A","og_url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/nl\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/","og_site_name":"DailyAI","article_published_time":"2025-03-26T21:31:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-10-25T14:51:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":683,"url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/6cfd0394-704d-4aae-8681-5f426c7c6a94-1024x683.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Sam Jeans","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@DailyAIOfficial","twitter_site":"@DailyAIOfficial","twitter_misc":{"Geschreven door":"Sam Jeans","Geschatte leestijd":"3 minuten"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/"},"author":{"name":"Sam Jeans","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#\/schema\/person\/711e81f945549438e8bbc579efdeb3c9"},"headline":"AI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process","datePublished":"2025-03-26T21:31:31+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-25T14:51:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/"},"wordCount":453,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/dai-house-14612.jpg","articleSection":["Industry"],"inLanguage":"nl-NL"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/","name":"AI zorgt voor opschudding in het wetenschappelijke peerreviewproces | DailyAI","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/dai-house-14612.jpg","datePublished":"2025-03-26T21:31:31+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-25T14:51:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"nl-NL","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"nl-NL","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/dai-house-14612.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/dai-house-14612.jpg","width":1472,"height":832,"caption":"Flat navy and red illustration on a cream background for the story: AI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2025\/03\/ai-stirs-up-trouble-in-the-science-peer-review-process\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"AI stirs up trouble in the science peer review process"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/","name":"DailyAI","description":"De AI-economie, gemeten.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"nl-NL"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#organization","name":"DailyAI","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"nl-NL","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/Daily-Ai_TL_colour.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/Daily-Ai_TL_colour.png","width":4501,"height":934,"caption":"DailyAI"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/DailyAIOfficial","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/dailyaiofficial\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@DailyAIOfficial"],"legalName":"Zero Hour Investments FZCO","foundingDate":"2023","slogan":"The AI economy, measured.","description":"DailyAI volgt de AI-economie in cijfers: datatrackers, onderzoek en begrijpelijk nieuws over banen, uitgaven, prijzen en financiering.","address":{"@type":"PostalAddress","addressCountry":"AE"},"contactPoint":{"@type":"ContactPoint","contactType":"customer support","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/contact\/"},"founder":{"@type":"Person","name":"David Merry","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/author\/davidmerry\/","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/davidmerry\/"]}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#\/schema\/person\/711e81f945549438e8bbc579efdeb3c9","name":"Sam Jeans","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"nl-NL","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/sam-jeans-dailyai.jpg","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/sam-jeans-dailyai.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/sam-jeans-dailyai.jpg","caption":"Sam Jeans"},"description":"Sam is een schrijver over wetenschap en technologie die bij verschillende AI-startups heeft gewerkt. In zijn vrije tijd leest hij graag medische tijdschriften of snuffelt hij tussen dozen met vinylplaten.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/sam-jeans-6746b9142\/"],"url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/nl\/author\/samjeans\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14612","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14612"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14612\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14618,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14612\/revisions\/14618"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15538"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14612"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14612"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14612"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}