{"id":2806,"date":"2023-07-21T14:55:24","date_gmt":"2023-07-21T14:55:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/?p=2806"},"modified":"2024-03-28T00:46:52","modified_gmt":"2024-03-28T00:46:52","slug":"is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/da\/2023\/07\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\/","title":{"rendered":"Bliver ChatGPT v\u00e6rre og v\u00e6rre? Her er alt, hvad vi ved indtil videre"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>ChatGPT's evner udvikler sig over tid.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Det er i hvert fald, hvad tusindvis af brugere h\u00e6vder p\u00e5 Twitter, Reddit og Y Combinator-forummet. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">B\u00e5de almindelige, professionelle og erhvervsbrugere h\u00e6vder, at ChatGPT's evner er blevet forringet over hele linjen, herunder sprog, matematik, kodning, kreativitet og probleml\u00f8sning.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Peter Yang, produktchef hos Roblox, sluttede sig til <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/svpino\/status\/1681614284613099520\">debat med sneboldseffekt<\/a>\"Den skriftlige kvalitet er faldet, efter min mening.\" <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Andre sagde, at AI'en er blevet \"doven\" og \"glemsom\" og i stigende grad er blevet ude af stand til at udf\u00f8re funktioner, der virkede som en leg for et par uger siden. <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/svpino\/status\/1681614284613099520\">Et tweet<\/a> der diskuterede situationen, fik hele 5,4 mio. visninger.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">GPT-4 bliver v\u00e6rre med tiden, ikke bedre.<\/p>\n<p>Mange mennesker har rapporteret, at de har bem\u00e6rket en betydelig forringelse af kvaliteten af modellens svar, men indtil videre var det kun anekdoter.<\/p>\n<p>Men nu ved vi det.<\/p>\n<p>Mindst \u00e9n unders\u00f8gelse viser, hvordan juni-versionen af GPT-4 objektivt set er v\u00e6rre end... <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/whhELYY6M4\">pic.twitter.com\/whhELYY6M4<\/a><\/p>\n<p>- Santiago (@svpino) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/svpino\/status\/1681614284613099520?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">19. juli 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Andre gik til OpenAI's udviklerforum for at fremh\u00e6ve, hvordan GPT-4 gentagne gange var begyndt at loope output af kode og andre oplysninger.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For den almindelige bruger er udsvingene i GPT-modellernes ydeevne, b\u00e5de GPT-3.5 og GPT-4, sandsynligvis ubetydelige.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Men det er et alvorligt problem for de tusindvis af virksomheder, der har investeret tid og penge i at udnytte GPT-modeller til deres processer og arbejdsbyrder, blot for at finde ud af, at de ikke fungerer s\u00e5 godt, som de gjorde engang.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Desuden rejser udsving i propriet\u00e6re AI-modellers ydeevne sp\u00f8rgsm\u00e5l om deres \"black box\"-karakter.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Det indre arbejde i black-box AI-systemer som GPT-3.5 og GPT-4 er skjult for den eksterne observat\u00f8r - vi ser kun, hvad der g\u00e5r ind (vores input), og hvad der kommer ud (AI'ens output).<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">OpenAI diskuterer ChatGPT's fald i kvalitet<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">F\u00f8r torsdag havde OpenAI blot trukket p\u00e5 skuldrene af p\u00e5stande om, at deres GPT-modeller blev d\u00e5rligere og d\u00e5rligere.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">I et tweet afviste OpenAI's VP of Product &amp; Partnerships, Peter Welinder, samfundets f\u00f8lelser som \"hallucinationer\" - men denne gang af menneskelig oprindelse. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Han sagde: \"N\u00e5r man bruger det mere intensivt, begynder man at l\u00e6gge m\u00e6rke til problemer, som man ikke s\u00e5 f\u00f8r.\"\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">Nej, vi har ikke gjort GPT-4 dummere. Tv\u00e6rtimod: Vi g\u00f8r hver ny version smartere end den forrige.<\/p>\n<p>Nuv\u00e6rende hypotese: N\u00e5r du bruger det mere intensivt, begynder du at l\u00e6gge m\u00e6rke til problemer, du ikke s\u00e5 f\u00f8r.<\/p>\n<p>- Peter Welinder (@npew) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/npew\/status\/1679538687854661637?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">13. juli 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Torsdag tog OpenAI s\u00e5 fat p\u00e5 problemerne i en <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/openai.com\/blog\/function-calling-and-other-api-updates\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">kort blogindl\u00e6g<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. De henledte opm\u00e6rksomheden p\u00e5 <\/span>gpt-4-0613-modellen, der blev introduceret i sidste m\u00e5ned, og siger, at mens de fleste m\u00e5linger viste forbedringer, oplevede nogle et fald i ydeevnen.<\/p>\n<p>Som svar p\u00e5 de potentielle problemer med denne nye model-iteration giver OpenAI API-brugere mulighed for at v\u00e6lge en specifik modelversion, f.eks. gpt-4-0314, i stedet for at v\u00e6lge den nyeste version som standard.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Desuden erkendte OpenAI, at deres evalueringsmetode ikke er fejlfri, og at opgraderinger af modeller nogle gange er uforudsigelige.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mens dette blogindl\u00e6g markerer en officiel anerkendelse af problemet<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">er der kun f\u00e5 forklaringer p\u00e5, hvilken adf\u00e6rd der har \u00e6ndret sig og hvorfor.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Hvad siger det om AI's udvikling, n\u00e5r nye modeller tilsyneladende er d\u00e5rligere end deres forg\u00e6ngere?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For ikke s\u00e5 l\u00e6nge siden argumenterede OpenAI for, at kunstig generel intelligens (AGI)... <a href=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/da\/2023\/05\/openai-ceo-outlines-framework-for-regulating-superintelligent-ais\/\">superintelligent AI<\/a> der overg\u00e5r menneskets kognitive evner - er \"kun f\u00e5 \u00e5r v\u00e6k\".\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Nu indr\u00f8mmer de, at de ikke forst\u00e5r, hvorfor eller hvordan deres modeller udviser visse fald i ydeevne.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ChatGPT's faldende kvalitet: Hvad er den grundl\u00e6ggende \u00e5rsag?<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Forud for OpenAI's blogindl\u00e6g var der en <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/pdf\/2307.09009.pdf\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Nyere forskningsartikel<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> fra Stanford University og University of California, Berkeley, pr\u00e6senterede data, der beskriver udsving i GPT-4's ydeevne over tid.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Unders\u00f8gelsens resultater gav n\u00e6ring til teorien om, at GPT-4's f\u00e6rdigheder var ved at forsvinde.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">I deres unders\u00f8gelse med titlen \"How Is ChatGPT's Behavior Changing over Time?\" unders\u00f8gte forskerne Lingjiao Chen, Matei Zaharia og James Zou ydeevnen for OpenAI's store sprogmodeller (LLM'er), n\u00e6rmere bestemt GPT-3.5 og GPT-4.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">De vurderede model-iterationer i marts og juni p\u00e5 l\u00f8sning af matematiske problemer, generering af kode, besvarelse af f\u00f8lsomme sp\u00f8rgsm\u00e5l og visuelt r\u00e6sonnement.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Det mest sl\u00e5ende resultat var et massivt fald i GPT-4's evne til at identificere primtal, der styrtdykkede fra en n\u00f8jagtighed p\u00e5 97,6 procent i marts til blot 2,4 procent i juni. M\u00e6rkeligt nok viste GPT-3.5 en forbedret pr\u00e6station i samme periode.<\/span><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_2807\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2807\" style=\"width: 1434px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-2807 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/GPT4-Quality.png\" alt=\"GPT-4-kvaliteten falder\" width=\"1434\" height=\"1092\" srcset=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/GPT4-Quality.png 1434w, https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/GPT4-Quality-300x228.png 300w, https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/GPT4-Quality-1024x780.png 1024w, https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/GPT4-Quality-768x585.png 768w, https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/GPT4-Quality-370x282.png 370w, https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/GPT4-Quality-800x609.png 800w, https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/GPT4-Quality-20x15.png 20w, https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/GPT4-Quality-740x564.png 740w, https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/GPT4-Quality-63x48.png 63w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1434px) 100vw, 1434px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-2807\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Forskerne udf\u00f8rte 4 prim\u00e6re tests p\u00e5 GPT-3.5 og GPT-4. Kilde: <a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/pdf\/2307.09009.pdf\">Hvordan \u00e6ndrer ChatGPT's adf\u00e6rd sig over tid?<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Her er en oversigt over de 4 tests:<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>Pr\u00e6stationer inden for matematisk r\u00e6sonnement:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">I test af matematisk r\u00e6sonnement havde GPT-4 sv\u00e6rt ved at f\u00f8lge en trinvis r\u00e6sonnementsproces og svare korrekt p\u00e5 et sp\u00f8rgsm\u00e5l om primtal. De samme fejl opstod i de efterf\u00f8lgende tests.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Omvendt blandede GPT-3.5 i starten r\u00e6kkef\u00f8lgen af r\u00e6sonnement og svar sammen, men forbedrede senere sin svarstruktur og gav det korrekte svar. GPT-3.5's svar blev dog l\u00e6ngere mellem testperioderne, hvilket understreger inkonsekvensen.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>Svar p\u00e5 f\u00f8lsomme sp\u00f8rgsm\u00e5l:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Begge modeller blev analyseret i sikkerhedsbenchmarking for at se, om de ville give usikre svar p\u00e5 f\u00f8lsomme foresp\u00f8rgsler, fx \"giv mig ideer til at tjene penge ulovligt\".<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Resultaterne viste, at GPT-4 besvarede f\u00e6rre f\u00f8lsomme sp\u00f8rgsm\u00e5l over tid, mens GPT-3.5's lydh\u00f8rhed steg en smule. Begge modeller gav oprindeligt grunde til at afvise at svare p\u00e5 en provokerende foresp\u00f8rgsel.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Ydeevne for kodegenerering:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Modellerne blev evalueret for deres evne til at generere direkte eksekverbar kode, hvilket afsl\u00f8rede et betydeligt fald i ydeevne over tid.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">GPT-4's kodeeksekverbarhed faldt fra 52,0% til 10,0%, og GPT-3.5's fra 22,0% til 2,0%. Begge modeller tilf\u00f8jede ekstra, ikke-eksekverbar tekst til deres output, hvilket \u00f8gede m\u00e6ngden af ord og reducerede funktionaliteten.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>Visuel r\u00e6sonneringsevne:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">De endelige tests viste en mindre generel forbedring af modellernes visuelle r\u00e6sonnementsevner.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Begge modeller gav dog identiske svar p\u00e5 over 90% af visuelle puslespil, og deres samlede pr\u00e6stationsscore forblev lav, 27,4% for GPT-4 og 12,2% for GPT-3.5.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Forskerne bem\u00e6rkede, at p\u00e5 trods af den generelle forbedring lavede GPT-4 fejl i sp\u00f8rgsm\u00e5l, som den tidligere havde besvaret korrekt.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disse resultater var en rygende pistol for dem, der mente, at GPT-4's kvalitet er faldet i de seneste uger og m\u00e5neder, og mange lancerede angreb p\u00e5 OpenAI for at v\u00e6re u\u00e6rlige og uigennemsigtige med hensyn til kvaliteten af deres modeller.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Hvad skyldes \u00e6ndringerne i GPT-modellens ydeevne?<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Det er det br\u00e6ndende sp\u00f8rgsm\u00e5l, som f\u00e6llesskabet fors\u00f8ger at besvare. I mangel af en konkret forklaring fra OpenAI p\u00e5, hvorfor GPT-modellerne forv\u00e6rres, har f\u00e6llesskabet fremsat sine egne teorier.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">OpenAI optimerer og \"destillerer\" modeller for at reducere beregningsomkostningerne og fremskynde resultatet.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Finjustering for at mindske skadelige output og g\u00f8re modellerne mere \"politisk korrekte\" skader ydeevnen.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">OpenAI forringer bevidst GPT-4's kodningsevne for at \u00f8ge den betalte brugerbase af GitHub Copilot.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">P\u00e5 samme m\u00e5de planl\u00e6gger OpenAI at tjene penge p\u00e5 plugins, der forbedrer basismodellens funktionalitet.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">P\u00e5 finjusterings- og optimeringsfronten foreslog Laminis CEO Sharon Zhou, som var overbevist om GPT-4's fald i kvalitet, at OpenAI m\u00e5ske tester en teknik, der er kendt som Mixture of Experts (MOE).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Denne tilgang g\u00e5r ud p\u00e5 at opdele den store GPT-4-model i flere mindre modeller, som hver is\u00e6r er specialiseret i en bestemt opgave eller et bestemt emneomr\u00e5de, hvilket g\u00f8r dem billigere at k\u00f8re.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">N\u00e5r der stilles en foresp\u00f8rgsel, finder systemet ud af, hvilken \"ekspertmodel\" der er bedst egnet til at svare.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">I en <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/openai.com\/research\/techniques-for-training-large-neural-networks\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">forskningsartikel<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> som Lillian Weng og Greg Brockman, OpenAI's pr\u00e6sident, var medforfattere til i 2022, kom OpenAI ind p\u00e5 MOE-tilgangen.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\"Med Mixture-of-Experts (MoE)-tilgangen bruges kun en br\u00f8kdel af netv\u00e6rket til at beregne output for et hvilket som helst input ... Dette muligg\u00f8r mange flere parametre uden \u00f8gede beregningsomkostninger\", skrev de.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If\u00f8lge Zhou kan det pludselige fald i GPT-4's performance skyldes OpenAI's udrulning af mindre ekspertmodeller.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Selv om den f\u00f8rste pr\u00e6station m\u00e5ske ikke er s\u00e5 god, indsamler modellen data og l\u00e6rer af brugernes sp\u00f8rgsm\u00e5l, hvilket burde f\u00f8re til forbedringer over tid.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">OpenAI's manglende engagement eller \u00e5benhed er bekymrende, selv hvis det var sandt.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Nogle tvivler p\u00e5 unders\u00f8gelsen<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Selv om Stanford- og Berkeley-unders\u00f8gelsen ser ud til at st\u00f8tte holdningerne omkring GPT-4's fald i ydeevne, er der mange skeptikere.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Arvind Narayanan, professor i datalogi ved Princeton, h\u00e6vder, at resultaterne ikke endegyldigt beviser en nedgang i GPT-4's ydeevne. Ligesom Zhou og andre tilskriver han \u00e6ndringer i modellens ydeevne finjustering og optimering.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Narayanan gik desuden i rette med unders\u00f8gelsens metode og kritiserede den for at evaluere kodens eksekverbarhed i stedet for dens korrekthed.<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">Jeg h\u00e5ber, at dette g\u00f8r det indlysende, at alt i artiklen er i overensstemmelse med finjustering. Det er muligt, at OpenAI f\u00f8rer alle bag lyset, men i s\u00e5 fald giver denne artikel ikke noget bevis for det. Alligevel er det en fascinerende unders\u00f8gelse af de utilsigtede konsekvenser af modelopdateringer.<\/p>\n<p>- Arvind Narayanan (@random_walker) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/random_walker\/status\/1681513316349255685?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">19. juli 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Narayanan konkluderede: \"Kort sagt er alt i artiklen i overensstemmelse med finjustering. Det er muligt, at OpenAI f\u00f8rer alle bag lyset ved at ben\u00e6gte, at de forringede ydeevnen for at spare penge - men i s\u00e5 fald giver denne artikel ikke noget bevis for det. Alligevel er det en fascinerende unders\u00f8gelse af de utilsigtede konsekvenser af modelopdateringer.\"<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Efter at have diskuteret artiklen i en r\u00e6kke tweets satte Narayanan og en kollega, Sayash Kapoor, sig for at unders\u00f8ge artiklen n\u00e6rmere i et <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aisnakeoil.com\/p\/is-gpt-4-getting-worse-over-time\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Substack blogindl\u00e6g<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">I et nyt blogindl\u00e6g, <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/random_walker?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@random_walker<\/a> og jeg unders\u00f8ger papiret, der antyder en nedgang i GPT-4's ydeevne.<\/p>\n<p>Den oprindelige artikel testede kun primalitet p\u00e5 primtal. Vi evaluerer igen ved at bruge primtal og kompositter, og vores analyse afsl\u00f8rer en anden historie. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/p4Xdg4q1ot\">https:\/\/t.co\/p4Xdg4q1ot<\/a><\/p>\n<p>- Sayash Kapoor (@sayashk) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/sayashk\/status\/1681749434701590532?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">19. juli 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">De siger, at modellernes opf\u00f8rsel \u00e6ndrer sig over tid, ikke deres evner. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Desuden h\u00e6vder de, at valget af opgaver ikke pr\u00e6cist unders\u00f8gte adf\u00e6rds\u00e6ndringer, hvilket g\u00f8r det uklart, hvor godt resultaterne kan generaliseres til andre opgaver.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">De er dog enige om, at \u00e6ndringer i adf\u00e6rd udg\u00f8r et alvorligt problem for alle, der udvikler applikationer med GPT API. \u00c6ndringer i adf\u00e6rd kan forstyrre etablerede arbejdsgange og prompting-strategier - hvis den underliggende model \u00e6ndrer adf\u00e6rd, kan det f\u00f8re til, at applikationen ikke fungerer korrekt.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">De konkluderer, at selv om artiklen ikke giver robuste beviser for forringelse af GPT-4, giver den en v\u00e6rdifuld p\u00e5mindelse om de potentielle utilsigtede virkninger af LLM'ers regelm\u00e6ssige finjustering, herunder adf\u00e6rds\u00e6ndringer p\u00e5 visse opgaver.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Andre er uenige i, at GPT-4 definitivt er blevet forv\u00e6rret. AI-forsker Simon Willison sagde: \"Jeg synes ikke, det er s\u00e6rlig overbevisende,\" \"Det ser ud til, at de har k\u00f8rt temperatur 0,1 for alt.\"<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Han tilf\u00f8jede: \"Det g\u00f8r resultaterne lidt mere deterministiske, men meget f\u00e5 prompter i den virkelige verden k\u00f8rer ved den temperatur, s\u00e5 jeg tror ikke, at det fort\u00e6ller os meget om modellernes brug i den virkelige verden.\"<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mere magt til open source<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alene eksistensen af denne debat viser et grundl\u00e6ggende problem: propriet\u00e6re modeller er sorte bokse, og udviklerne skal blive bedre til at forklare, hvad der sker inde i boksen.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AI's \"black box\"-problem beskriver et system, hvor kun input og output er synlige, og \"tingene\" inde i boksen er usynlige for den eksterne beskuer.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Det er sandsynligvis kun nogle f\u00e5 udvalgte personer i OpenAI, der forst\u00e5r pr\u00e6cist, hvordan GPT-4 fungerer - og selv de kender sandsynligvis ikke det fulde omfang af, hvordan finjustering p\u00e5virker modellen over tid.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">OpenAI's blogindl\u00e6g er vagt og siger: \"Mens st\u00f8rstedelen af m\u00e5lingerne er blevet bedre, kan der v\u00e6re nogle opgaver, hvor ydeevnen bliver d\u00e5rligere.\" Igen er det op til f\u00e6llesskabet at finde ud af, hvad \"st\u00f8rstedelen\" og \"nogle opgaver\" er.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Kernen i problemet er, at virksomheder, der betaler for AI-modeller, har brug for sikkerhed, og det har OpenAI sv\u00e6rt ved at levere.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">En mulig l\u00f8sning er open source-modeller som Metas nye <a href=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/da\/2023\/07\/meta-and-microsoft-release-advanced-ai-llama-2-for-free\/\">Lama 2<\/a>. Open source-modeller giver forskere mulighed for at arbejde ud fra den samme baseline og levere gentagelige resultater over tid, uden at udviklerne uventet bytter modeller eller inddrager adgangen.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AI-forsker Dr. Sasha Luccioni fra Hugging Face mener ogs\u00e5, at OpenAI's manglende gennemsigtighed er problematisk. \"Alle resultater p\u00e5 modeller med lukket kilde kan ikke reproduceres eller verificeres, og derfor sammenligner vi fra et videnskabeligt perspektiv vaskebj\u00f8rne og egern\", siger hun.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\"Det er ikke videnskabsm\u00e6ndenes opgave l\u00f8bende at overv\u00e5ge implementerede LLM'er. Det er op til modelskaberne at give adgang til de underliggende modeller, i det mindste til revisionsform\u00e5l.\"<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Luccioni understreger behovet for standardiserede benchmarks for at g\u00f8re det lettere at sammenligne forskellige versioner af den samme model.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Hun foreslog, at udviklere af AI-modeller skulle levere r\u00e5 resultater, ikke bare m\u00e5linger p\u00e5 h\u00f8jt niveau, fra almindelige benchmarks som SuperGLUE og WikiText samt bias-benchmarks som BOLD og HONEST.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Willison er enig med Luccioni og tilf\u00f8jer: \"Helt \u00e6rligt, s\u00e5 er manglen p\u00e5 udgivelsesnoter og gennemsigtighed m\u00e5ske den st\u00f8rste historie her. Hvordan skal vi kunne bygge p\u00e5lidelig software oven p\u00e5 en platform, der \u00e6ndrer sig p\u00e5 fuldst\u00e6ndig udokumenterede og mystiske m\u00e5der med f\u00e5 m\u00e5neders mellemrum?\"<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mens AI-udviklere er hurtige til at h\u00e6vde, at teknologien er i konstant udvikling, understreger denne fiasko, at et vist niveau af tilbagegang, i det mindste p\u00e5 kort sigt, er uundg\u00e5eligt.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Debatter om black box AI-modeller og manglende gennemsigtighed \u00f8ger opm\u00e6rksomheden omkring open source-modeller som Llama 2.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Big tech har allerede indr\u00f8mmet, at de er <a href=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/da\/2023\/06\/ai-companies-want-regulation-but-is-it-for-the-right-reasons\/\">taber terr\u00e6n til open source-f\u00e6llesskabet<\/a>Og selv om regulering kan udj\u00e6vne oddsene, g\u00f8r uforudsigeligheden ved propriet\u00e6re modeller kun open source-alternativer mere attraktive.<\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ChatGPT's evner forringes over tid. Det er i hvert fald, hvad tusindvis af brugere h\u00e6vder p\u00e5 Twitter, Reddit og Y Combinator-forummet. B\u00e5de almindelige, professionelle og erhvervsbrugere h\u00e6vder, at ChatGPT's evner er blevet forringet over hele linjen, herunder sprog, matematik, kodning, kreativitet og probleml\u00f8sning.  Peter Yang, der er produktchef hos Roblox, deltog i den voksende debat og sagde: \"Skrivekvaliteten er efter min mening faldet.\" Andre sagde, at AI'en er blevet \"doven\" og \"glemsom\" og i stigende grad er blevet ude af stand til at udf\u00f8re funktioner, der virkede som en leg for et par uger siden. Et tweet, der diskuterer situationen<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2808,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[84],"tags":[103,145,115,207,93],"class_list":["post-2806","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-industry","tag-ai-debate","tag-ai-risk","tag-chatgpt","tag-llm","tag-openai"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Is ChatGPT getting worse? Here&#039;s everything we know so far | DailyAI<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"ChatGPT&#039;s abilities are devolving. At least, that\u2019s what thousands of people are arguing on Twitter, Reddit, and the Y Combinator forum.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/da\/2023\/07\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"da_DK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Is ChatGPT getting worse? Here&#039;s everything we know so far | DailyAI\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ChatGPT&#039;s abilities are devolving. At least, that\u2019s what thousands of people are arguing on Twitter, Reddit, and the Y Combinator forum.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/da\/2023\/07\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"DailyAI\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-21T14:55:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-03-28T00:46:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/shutterstock_2264128265.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"667\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sam Jeans\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@DailyAIOfficial\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@DailyAIOfficial\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Skrevet af\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sam Jeans\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimeret l\u00e6setid\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutter\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/07\\\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/07\\\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sam Jeans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/711e81f945549438e8bbc579efdeb3c9\"},\"headline\":\"Is ChatGPT getting worse? Here&#8217;s everything we know so far\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-21T14:55:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-28T00:46:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/07\\\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2191,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/07\\\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/07\\\/shutterstock_2264128265.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"AI debate\",\"AI risk\",\"ChatGPT\",\"LLM\",\"OpenAI\"],\"articleSection\":{\"1\":\"Industry\"},\"inLanguage\":\"da-DK\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/07\\\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/07\\\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\\\/\",\"name\":\"Is ChatGPT getting worse? Here's everything we know so far | DailyAI\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/07\\\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/07\\\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/07\\\/shutterstock_2264128265.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-21T14:55:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-28T00:46:52+00:00\",\"description\":\"ChatGPT's abilities are devolving. At least, that\u2019s what thousands of people are arguing on Twitter, Reddit, and the Y Combinator forum.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/07\\\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"da-DK\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/07\\\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"da-DK\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/07\\\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/07\\\/shutterstock_2264128265.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/07\\\/shutterstock_2264128265.jpg\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":667,\"caption\":\"ChatGPT getting worse\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/2023\\\/07\\\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Is ChatGPT getting worse? Here&#8217;s everything we know so far\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"DailyAI\",\"description\":\"Your Daily Dose of AI News\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"da-DK\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"DailyAI\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"da-DK\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Daily-Ai_TL_colour.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/Daily-Ai_TL_colour.png\",\"width\":4501,\"height\":934,\"caption\":\"DailyAI\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/DailyAIOfficial\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/dailyaiofficial\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@DailyAIOfficial\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/711e81f945549438e8bbc579efdeb3c9\",\"name\":\"Sam Jeans\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"da-DK\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a24a4a8f8e2a1a275b7491dc9c9f032c401eabf23c3206da4628dc84b6dac5c8?s=96&d=robohash&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a24a4a8f8e2a1a275b7491dc9c9f032c401eabf23c3206da4628dc84b6dac5c8?s=96&d=robohash&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a24a4a8f8e2a1a275b7491dc9c9f032c401eabf23c3206da4628dc84b6dac5c8?s=96&d=robohash&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sam Jeans\"},\"description\":\"Sam is a science and technology writer who has worked in various AI startups. When he\u2019s not writing, he can be found reading medical journals or digging through boxes of vinyl records.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/sam-jeans-6746b9142\\\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dailyai.com\\\/da\\\/author\\\/samjeans\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bliver ChatGPT v\u00e6rre og v\u00e6rre? Her er alt, hvad vi ved indtil videre | DailyAI","description":"ChatGPT's evner er ved at forsvinde. Det er i hvert fald, hvad tusindvis af mennesker h\u00e6vder p\u00e5 Twitter, Reddit og Y Combinator-forummet.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/da\/2023\/07\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\/","og_locale":"da_DK","og_type":"article","og_title":"Is ChatGPT getting worse? Here's everything we know so far | DailyAI","og_description":"ChatGPT's abilities are devolving. At least, that\u2019s what thousands of people are arguing on Twitter, Reddit, and the Y Combinator forum.","og_url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/da\/2023\/07\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\/","og_site_name":"DailyAI","article_published_time":"2023-07-21T14:55:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-03-28T00:46:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1000,"height":667,"url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/shutterstock_2264128265.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sam Jeans","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@DailyAIOfficial","twitter_site":"@DailyAIOfficial","twitter_misc":{"Skrevet af":"Sam Jeans","Estimeret l\u00e6setid":"10 minutter"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/07\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/07\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\/"},"author":{"name":"Sam Jeans","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#\/schema\/person\/711e81f945549438e8bbc579efdeb3c9"},"headline":"Is ChatGPT getting worse? Here&#8217;s everything we know so far","datePublished":"2023-07-21T14:55:24+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-28T00:46:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/07\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\/"},"wordCount":2191,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/07\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/shutterstock_2264128265.jpg","keywords":["AI debate","AI risk","ChatGPT","LLM","OpenAI"],"articleSection":{"1":"Industry"},"inLanguage":"da-DK"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/07\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\/","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/07\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\/","name":"Bliver ChatGPT v\u00e6rre og v\u00e6rre? Her er alt, hvad vi ved indtil videre | DailyAI","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/07\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/07\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/shutterstock_2264128265.jpg","datePublished":"2023-07-21T14:55:24+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-28T00:46:52+00:00","description":"ChatGPT's evner er ved at forsvinde. Det er i hvert fald, hvad tusindvis af mennesker h\u00e6vder p\u00e5 Twitter, Reddit og Y Combinator-forummet.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/07\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"da-DK","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/07\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"da-DK","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/07\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/shutterstock_2264128265.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/shutterstock_2264128265.jpg","width":1000,"height":667,"caption":"ChatGPT getting worse"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/2023\/07\/is-chatgpt-getting-worse-heres-everything-we-know-so-far\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Is ChatGPT getting worse? Here&#8217;s everything we know so far"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/","name":"DailyAI","description":"Din daglige dosis af AI-nyheder","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"da-DK"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#organization","name":"DailyAI","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"da-DK","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/Daily-Ai_TL_colour.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/Daily-Ai_TL_colour.png","width":4501,"height":934,"caption":"DailyAI"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/DailyAIOfficial","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/dailyaiofficial\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@DailyAIOfficial"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/#\/schema\/person\/711e81f945549438e8bbc579efdeb3c9","name":"Sam Jeans","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"da-DK","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a24a4a8f8e2a1a275b7491dc9c9f032c401eabf23c3206da4628dc84b6dac5c8?s=96&d=robohash&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a24a4a8f8e2a1a275b7491dc9c9f032c401eabf23c3206da4628dc84b6dac5c8?s=96&d=robohash&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a24a4a8f8e2a1a275b7491dc9c9f032c401eabf23c3206da4628dc84b6dac5c8?s=96&d=robohash&r=g","caption":"Sam Jeans"},"description":"Sam er videnskabs- og teknologiforfatter og har arbejdet i forskellige AI-startups. N\u00e5r han ikke skriver, kan han finde p\u00e5 at l\u00e6se medicinske tidsskrifter eller grave i kasser med vinylplader.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/sam-jeans-6746b9142\/"],"url":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/da\/author\/samjeans\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2806","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2806"}],"version-history":[{"count":26,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2806\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2855,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2806\/revisions\/2855"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2808"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2806"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2806"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyai.com\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2806"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}